(07-14-2023, 07:36 PM)OrganPlayer Wrote: That is also not so inportend if the basic is good Drums and bass and it sound good than i am happy

for the rest is it not so inportend


You make 3 song styles for me on the korg the miss instruments but that is really not inportend the basic is good enoufg to use your styles with the songs

That is inportend and i meant that the 3 styles you make for me the are perfeckt that is why i say even there mis som instruments no any problem for me

The basic must be good we always have say that to each other already many years ago also you brother say that you Remeber

 if the styles sound good and the basic is good we have a great song style that is what i think

(07-14-2023, 04:55 PM)Chello Wrote: MY SONG STYLES DO NOT FOLLOW THE "NORM"

If you're looking for a song style that sounds exactly like the original, you won't find this one among my creations.

The reason is simple:
I can't bear to copy what already exists - I want to create something new and different.

I see no point in creating a song style that is identical to the original, no matter how good the original may be.
I also can't stand "Elvis clones" - Elvis became famous not because he copied someone else, but because he was himself.
He was unique, while his copies will forever appear mediocre.

That's not to say that I don't draw inspiration from others, but I try to do this MY way.
I leave MY fingerprint.

(07-14-2023, 09:53 PM)Robinez Wrote: I couldn't agree more, copying an original track is just work and quite boring to do. When I play existing songs I always experiment with alternate chord structures, other arrangements and sounds. Same applies for the song styles I create. I keep the original recognisable parts and then I modify a lot.

Just like the Stevie Wonder - higher ground style in my favorites tutorial, I've used the original parts of the clavs and played all kind of extra parts on top of it (like the brass sounds)